Will EU common asylum policy prevent tragic refugee drownings?

Will EU common asylum policy prevent tragic refugee drownings?

On June 14, the world woke as much as the harrowing news of the drowning of tons of of individuals off the coast of Greece. Most of these killed within the Mediterranean Sea are believed to be financial migrants from the Global South who have been making the damaging journey for a greater future.

As the tragedy unfolded, human rights organizations all around the world pointed to the pressing want for a coverage mechanism to reduce such tragedies sooner or later.

Per week earlier than the Greek drowning, the EU agreed for a standard asylum coverage — coming after almost a decade of deliberations — per week earlier than the Greek drowning tragedy that focuses on the foundations of processing asylum functions in gentle of how the states share obligations in caring for the asylum seekers as soon as they’ve entered the border below jurisdiction.

“Hugely significant step” for the EU on migration, stated European Commissioner for Home Affairs Ylva Johansson. German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser referred to as the agreements “not easy decisions for all, but historic.”

The coverage closely focuses on EU international locations sharing the internet hosting of asylum-seekers, primarily in Greece and Italy on the bloc’s rim.

EU nations refusing to simply accept refugees from these international locations should pay €20,000 ($21,000) per particular person right into a Brussels-managed fund.

Support for the proposals was not common throughout the bloc, with Poland and Hungary voting towards them and Bulgaria, Malta, Lithuania, and Slovakia abstaining.

Though not legally binding but, the deal allows parliamentary negotiations on laws, anticipated earlier than the subsequent European elections in June 2024.

It additionally mandates fast-track border procedures for arrivals from international locations deemed protected, to facilitate returns.

Belgian Secretary of State for Asylum and Migration Nicole de Moor has reportedly stated that folks from “Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Senegal, Bangladesh and Pakistan” had statistically much less probability of gaining refugee standing.

The EU is social gathering to the 1951 Refugee Convention, permitting asylum or returns to a 3rd nation. The deal requires implementing the protected third nation coverage by 2026.

Samar Abbas, a lawyer primarily based in Pakistan with an experience on refugee rights in Europe, believes that the protected third nation coverage is much from actuality as phrases for returns and engagement stay undiscussed between the EU and third international locations.

“The EU is mandated and responsible to rescue and help those who have reached its border irrespective of their nationalities,” Abbas stated.

Meanwhile in Denmark, authorities haven’t expressed an official place on the coverage. But previously, the nation has maintained that it needs to collaborate with different EU nations on transfering asylum seekers exterior the bloc whereas their functions are pending.

Migration and Integration Minister Kaare Dybvad stated in January that Copenhagen suspended talks with Rwanda because it seeks EU assist.

“We are not holding any negotiations at the moment about the establishment of a Danish reception center in Rwanda,” Dybvad instructed Danish media. “This is a new government. We still have the same ambition, but we have a different process,” he stated.

Abbas believes the settlement focuses extra on cost-sharing than refugee rights and well-being.

“If we look at the document and its direction, it is pretty much clear that the agreement is not focused on the refugees or asylum seekers but responding on the demands of the EU countries to get funds to accommodate refugees,” he stated. “Every EU country will want to be a beneficiary of this scheme that involves millions of euros. Hence the focus is not on the rehabilitation but on the economic gains.”

Eva Singer, director of asylum on the Danish Refugee Council, stated EU nations stay skeptical of refugees, taking years to agree as a result of they needed totally different insurance policies.

“If you look at overall case scenario, you will see that there is an increasing majority of the EU countries who wants to control the outer borders more on what is happening now. And with more controls, there is always a risk that people’s human rights are going to be violated.”

Singer stated diplomatic assist, assist, and help for refugees — probably by way of the UN organizations just like the UNHCR — have been lengthy overdue.

“I don’t think that will stop people from crossing the Mediterranean Sea through dangerous journeys, but we need to provide as much as possible alternatives so that people can travel more safely and also as Europe is in close cooperation with other countries it needs to ensure more safe, legal routes to the migration.”

Abbas, nonetheless, stated that with the present right-wing political development being noticed all throughout the Europe, it’s wishful pondering that safer, safer passage for migration can be accessible to folks from the Global South.

“With the conflicts and climate change affecting the daily livelihood of the people, it is natural that the people will seek better opportunities to save their lives and livelihood in Europe. It is pertinent for all that the refugee and asylum seekers are seen in more humane way than an opportunity to squeeze as much financial opportunity as possible.”

Source: www.anews.com.tr