US lawmakers push to ban TikTok on government devices

US lawmakers push to ban TikTok on government devices

Nearly 20 US states have already banned TikTok after Republicans claimed its possession by Chinese agency ByteDance made it unsafe for Americans.

TikTok is consumed by two-thirds of American teens and has become the second-most popular domain in the world.
TikTok is consumed by two-thirds of American teenagers and has change into the second-most common area on the planet.
(Reuters Archive)

The US Congress is on the cusp of approving a nationwide ban on utilizing TikTok on authorities units due to perceived safety dangers — thrusting the massively common video-sharing platform into a fragile place over Washington’s ties to China.

Congress has unveiled a spending invoice on Tuesday that might require the Biden administration to ban most makes use of of TikTok or some other app created by its proprietor, ByteDance Ltd.  

The measure would observe bans in practically 20 US states, the place Republicans have led the assault in opposition to TikTok, arguing that its possession by Chinese agency ByteDance makes the app unsafe for Americans.

“The fundamental problem is this…TikTok is owned by ByteDance, which is effectively controlled by the Chinese Communist Party,” Republican congressman Mike Gallagher defined to CNN on Sunday.

But what has lengthy been a rallying cry for conservatives is changing into more and more widespread amongst their Democratic colleagues, to the purpose that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stated Friday she was in favour of placing the draft to a vote this week.

“This is not a political issue between Republicans and Democrats. This is a United States issue that we need to address nationally,” Ryan McDougle, a Republican state senator from Virginia who has been on the forefront of the difficulty, instructed AFP news company.

Another invoice, additionally launched final week by representatives from each events, requires an outright ban on TikTok within the United States, although it doesn’t appear more likely to be taken up for a proper vote for now.

No hyperlinks to Communist Party

TikTok has labored exhausting to persuade US authorities that it isn’t a menace and that US information is protected and saved on servers situated within the United States.

But following media experiences, it has additionally admitted that staff primarily based in China had entry to that information, though the corporate insisted it was below strict and extremely restricted circumstances.

“We have not been asked for such data from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). We have not provided US user data to the CCP, nor would we if asked,” the corporate stated in a letter to Congress.

Still, TikTok is combating furiously to appease Washington and is placing all of its hopes in a long-term safety take care of the administration of President Joe Biden that has been below negotiation for 2 years.

This could be carried out by way of the Committee on Foreign Investment within the United States (CFIUS), an interagency arm of the US authorities that assesses the dangers of any overseas funding to nationwide safety.

A deal would carry “a comprehensive package of measures” and “independent oversight to address concerns about TikTok content recommendation and access to US user data,” the corporate instructed AFP in a press release.

The association could be “well beyond what any peer company is doing today,” it added.

But given the rising political stress, discovering widespread floor with the US authorities will probably be tough, safety specialists stated.

TikTok is consumed by two-thirds of American teenagers and has change into the second-most common area on the planet, however there’s lengthy been a bipartisan concern in Washington that Beijing would use authorized and regulatory energy to grab American person information or attempt to push pro-China narratives or misinformation.

READ MORE: How TikTok’s shaky algorithm fails to guard customers from dangerous content material

Source: TRTWorld and companies

Leave a Reply