Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Heard appeal alleges that errors led to Johnny Depp’s trial win

Heard appeal alleges that errors led to Johnny Depp’s trial win

Published December 06,2022


Subscribe

Amber Heard has formally appealed the choice within the defamation case introduced by Johnny Depp, along with her attorneys citing what they imagine to be quite a few errors dedicated at trial, together with permitting the case to be heard in Virginia and refusing to permit communications between Heard and sure medical doctors to be admitted as proof.

The “Pirates of the Caribbean” star in June was awarded $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages — the latter decreased to $350,000 consistent with Virginia statute — after Heard was discovered accountable for defaming him in an essay revealed by the Washington Post.

Heard, who had filed a countersuit, was awarded $2 million on the similar time after the jury discovered Depp accountable for a remark made about Heard by his then-attorney Adam Waldman.

Heard’s attraction was filed Nov. 23 with the Court of Appeals in Virginia.

Depp initially sued the “Aquaman” actor for $50 million in March 2019, alleging that an essay revealed by the Washington Post — whose servers are in Virginia — dubbed him a perpetrator of “sexual violence” and price him tens of hundreds of thousands of {dollars}’ value of misplaced work.

She countersued for $100 million in summer season of 2020, although lawyer Elaine Bredehoft later stated that Heard did not need that a lot cash however quite needed to ship a message to her former husband.

In the attraction, Heard’s authorized crew alleges that California was the one acceptable venue for the trial and states that Virginia was a “completely inconvenient forum” for the case, with “both parties and most of the fact witnesses … located in California, with none of them located in Virginia.”

The attraction alleges errors surrounding proof have been made, together with exclusion of the November 2020 resolution within the U.Okay. defamation case that Depp introduced unsuccessfully towards the Sun, which had labeled him a “wife beater.”

The attraction claims irrelevant and prejudicial proof was allowed, whereas third-party communications that allegedly went to each events’ states of thoughts — together with Heard’s communications with medical personnel — have been excluded.

Among the opposite claims made within the attraction: Depp’s authorized crew allegedly didn’t show “actual malice”; the jury was improperly instructed concerning the function of precise malice within the case; Heard did not write the web model of the headline that was mentioned in court docket; the award was extreme; and the essay itself, which didn’t point out Depp by identify, was “not reasonably capable of conveying a defamatory implication.”

While each events filed preliminary attraction paperwork in July, Depp’s detailed submitting did not come till early November. Now that Heard’s detailed submitting is in as effectively, the case will go to a three-judge court docket of appeals panel for selections.

If both Depp or Heard is unhappy with the appeals court docket’s resolution, they’ll petition Virginia’s Supreme Court.

Leave a Reply