Arda Güler, the promising soccer sensation who performed an influential position within the gripping twenty seventh week Süper Lig match that left a major impression on many, discovered himself on the receiving finish of an onslaught of criticism for his workforce’s awarded penalty place.
Nevertheless, he shone as a star throughout the sport in opposition to Beşiktaş, which was marked by excessive feelings and several other contentious calls.
Of specific curiosity was the penalty awarded to Fenerbahçe’s rising star, Arda Güler, who fell to the bottom after a tussle with Onur Bulut, and the match referee, Halil Umut Meler, pointed to the penalty spot.
This choice sparked a heated debate and prompted a stir on social media.
Beşiktaş’s right-back, Onur Bulut, vehemently protested the choice, arguing that he had not made any contact with Arda Güler. This led to a heated alternate of phrases between the 18-year-old star and Onur Bulut, with Cenk Tosun, an skilled soccer participant, finally stepping in to diffuse the scenario.
Despite the controversy surrounding the incident, Arda remained composed and acknowledged that the choice was made by the referee and never him.
Following the match, Cenk Tosun expressed his perception that Arda didn’t deliberately dive, though there was contact between the 2 gamers, and he felt that Arda had given up earlier than the contact was made.
The controversy surrounding the incident captured the eye of the Turkish Football Federation (TFF) President Mehmet Büyükekşi, who defended the choice to nominate Halil Umut Meler because the match’s most important official.
Büyükekşi said that the referees who officiated different matches throughout the week had been appointed by an algorithm, whereas the derby match referee was manually appointed, in response to a request made by the referee’s committee.
However, what additional fueled the scenario had been the statements made by the central referee committee chairperson, Lale Orta.
Orta contended that the penalty name was mistaken and that it ought to have been corrected by VAR.
Speaking on beIN Sports, Orta stated: “We definitely cannot talk about a penalty here. I don’t think they will call this position a penalty anywhere in the world. It is a wrong decision on the field. It is clear that this needs to be corrected by VAR. VAR was not corrected by making a wrong decision and was not corrected by intervening. Two wrong decisions in a row, the wrong result came out.”
On social media, notably Twitter, many Beşiktaş followers expressed their displeasure at what they perceived as diving by Arda Güler and the referee’s choice, tarnishing Güler’s picture within the Beşiktaş camp.
Nonetheless, contemplating Güler’s potential not simply as a Yellow Canary however his standing as a Turkish worldwide, the negativity ought to be averted, particularly because the penalty name didn’t have an effect on the match’s end result.
In abstract, the Fenerbahçe-Beşiktaş match was a memorable spectacle that had an enduring affect on the soccer neighborhood.
Despite the contentious selections made throughout the sport, Arda Güler’s expertise and composure proceed to impress many.
Source: www.dailysabah.com
