The eleventh Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed the choice of the native court docket, stating that the explanations put ahead by the legal professionals of the defendants within the attraction petitions weren’t of a nature to necessitate the reversal of the choice within the unique and consolidated case.
Regarding Uber, which was began for use in Istanbul in 2014 and serviced by 5 million customers in Turkey, the United Taxi Drivers Association and Istanbul Automobile Tradesmen Chamber officers on behalf of the taxi drivers in Istanbul, Istanbul tenth and eleventh Commercial Courts of First Instance, and entry to Uber. “Unfair competition” lawsuits have been filed demanding that the corporate be blocked and banned from Turkey.
The plaintiffs additionally requested the cessation of operations of the US firm Uber Technologies Inc. In the lawsuit petitions of the taxi drivers, it was claimed that the US-based firm, which doesn’t have any tax data in Turkey, made unlawful transportation over the web, and to stop the taxi drivers from incurring irreparable damages, to guard competitors and commerce, to stop tax losses within the nation and to reorganize the business life. All actions have been suspended.
On October 16, 2019, the choice was clarified and an attraction was made.
The Istanbul tenth Commercial Court of First Instance, the place the circumstances have been later joined, made its closing resolution on October 16, 2019, on the finish of the trial course of, the place professional studies have been obtained and discussions befell, and accepted the request to dam entry to Uber and to ban the corporate from Turkey.
The court docket board dominated that Uber’s providers represent unfair competitors, that unfair competitors is prohibited, that entry to “www.uber.com” and Uber cell purposes and Uber XL, the place Uber providers are provided, are blocked.
With the choice, Uber’s actions in Turkey have been stopped. An attraction was filed to overturn the choice.
Source: www.nationalturk.com
