More than 90 nations have expressed “deep concern” at Israel’s punitive measures towards the Palestinian folks, management and civil society following a U.N. request for an advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice on the legality of Israeli insurance policies within the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.
In a press release launched Monday by the Palestinians, the signatories referred to as for a reversal of the Israeli measures, saying no matter their place on the General Assembly’s decision, “we reject punitive measures in response to a request for an advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice.”
The 193-member General Assembly voted 87-26 with 53 abstentions on Dec. 30 in favor of the decision which was promoted by the Palestinians and opposed vehemently by Israel. Even although rulings by the International Court of Justice usually are not legally binding, they are often influential on world opinion.
Israel’s new hard-line authorities responded on Jan. 6, approving steps to penalize the Palestinians in retaliation. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu advised a gathering of his Cabinet two days later that the measures towards the Palestinians have been geared toward what he referred to as “an extreme anti-Israel” step on the United Nations.
The authorities’s Security Cabinet determined to withhold $39 million from the Palestinian Authority and switch the funds as an alternative to a compensation program for the households of Israeli victims of Palestinian militant assaults.
It additionally determined to deduct the quantity of income Israel usually transfers to the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority by a sum equal to the quantity paid final yr to households of Palestinian prisoners and people killed within the battle, together with militants implicated in assaults towards Israelis. The Palestinian management describes the funds as vital social welfare, whereas Israel says the so-called Martyrs’ Fund incentivizes violence.
The Security Cabinet additionally focused Palestinian officers straight, saying it might deny advantages to “VIPs who are leading the political and legal war against Israel.”
The first Palestinian affected was Foreign Minister Riad Malki who stated in a press release on Jan. 8 that he was coming back from the Brazilian president’s inauguration when he was knowledgeable that Israel rescinded his VIP journey allow, which permits high Palestinian officers to journey extra simply out and in of the occupied West Bank than extraordinary Palestinians.
The assertion launched Monday was signed by representatives of Arab nations and the 57-member Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and 37 different nations – 27 of them from Europe, together with Germany, France and Italy, in addition to Japan, South Korea, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa.
Palestinian U.N. Ambassador Riyad Mansour welcomed the assertion of assist, telling The Associated Press that “we exercised our democratic rights to go to the General Assembly in a peaceful way, a legal way, and put a question to the ICJ to seek an advisory opinion.”
“What is amazing about that statement,” he stated, is that it was signed by some nations that abstained or voted towards the decision referring the query to the court docket.
“But to punish people for going to the General Assembly in an adoption of a resolution is something else,” Mansour stated. “That’s why they stood with us and opposed this policy of the Israeli government, and they are demanding a reversal of this decision.”
He predicted extra nations will assist the assertion when the Security Council holds its month-to-month assembly on the Middle East specializing in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian battle on Jan. 18.
