Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Johnson allies could face suspension for partygate committee comments

Johnson allies could face suspension for partygate committee comments

Former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s staunchest allies, together with Nadine Dorries and Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, might face suspension from parliament for his or her roles in a marketing campaign in opposition to the committee investigating the ex-premier’s partygate lies.

The Privileges Committee highlighted feedback by senior lawmakers together with Dorries, Sir Jacob and Dame Priti Patel together with friends together with Lord Goldsmith – a serving minister – claiming it was a part of a co-ordinated try and undermine the panel’s work.

The committee mentioned MPs ought to think about whether or not their actions could possibly be thought of a contempt of Parliament and what additional motion to take.

The Privileges Committee in the end triggered Johnson’s resignation from Parliament in protest at its suggestion that he ought to face a prolonged suspension for deceptive the Commons along with his denials of lockdown-busting events in Downing Street.

His supporters regularly attacked the Labour-led however Tory-majority committee as a “witch hunt” and “kangaroo court” – with Johnson discovered to be complicit within the marketing campaign in opposition to the panel investigating him.

Other MPs quoted within the report embrace Mark Jenkinson, Sir Michael Fabricant, Brendan Clarke-Smith and Dame Andrea Jenkyns.

The report mentioned the MPs criticised “did not choose to engage through any proper process such as the submission of letters or evidence to our inquiry, but by attacking the members of the committee, in order to influence their judgment”.

Their goal was to “influence the outcome of the inquiry”, “impede the work of the committee by inducing members to resign from it”, “discredit the committee’s conclusions if those conclusions were not what they wanted” and “discredit the Committee as a whole”, it mentioned.

The report added: “The committee is particularly concerned about attacks mounted by experienced colleagues, including a serving minister of the Crown, a former leader of the House and a former secretary of state for digital, culture, media and sport.”

In a reference to Dorries’ work on TalkTV and Sir Jacob’s GB News position, the committee mentioned “two of the Members mounting the most vociferous attacks on the committee did so from the platform of their own hosted TV shows”.

Source: www.anews.com.tr