Dutch legislation enforcement companies are inundated with problems with racism, use of extreme drive, prejudice and discrimination, in keeping with a examine.
French journalist Clement Verite stated the analysis revealed that the police within the Netherlands used extra violence in 2021 in comparison with 2019 and 2020, including: “The Dutch police used force in 18,477 incidents in 2021. This is 12% higher than 2020 and 27% compared to 2019.”
The journalist underlined that 231 law enforcement officials acted unlawfully out of over 18,000 incidents of violence recorded in 2021. “In 90% of the evaluations, it was concluded that the officers used force within the appropriate and legal framework. It was stated that only 231 officers, which make up only 2% of those who used force, were out of line,” stated Verite.
Noting that law enforcement officials who used violence elevated in 2022, Verite stated: “Although this does not directly mean excessive use of force, in 2022, it was determined that the police did not act following the rules in 266 cases. This corresponds to 13% of the cases investigated regarding the use of force by the police.”
Racism, discrimination
Verite talked about the remarks by National Police Chief Henk Van Essen on racism and discrimination “still being a structural problem in the police.”
He added: “In 2020, it was revealed that six police officers working in Rotterdam used racist insults and hurtful expressions in their messages.”
“Among these statements was the message ‘another Turk is lacking,’ relating to the capturing and killing of a 16-year-old scholar of Turkish origin by a police officer.
“The revelation of the messages caused public outrage, and an investigation was launched.”
Verite talked about Eindhoven Councilor Mpanzu Bamenga, who is continually subjected to searches at airports within the Netherlands as a result of the official “doesn’t look Dutch.”
“Bamenga filed a lawsuit against the Dutch province in September 2021 with five human rights associations, alleging that dark-skinned people are more likely to be checked. Bamenga and human rights associations argued that stopping and searching by Dutch border police based on ethnicity was discriminatory,” he stated.
Verite famous the court docket’s determination on the usage of racial standards in border controls constitutes “racial discrimination,” including: “The Dutch Court of Justice has decided that ethnic origin can be a criterion in border searches without being considered as discrimination by the Dutch Marechaussee.”
Marechaussee is the nationwide gendarmerie drive of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
“The appeal was challenged, and in Feb. 2023, The Hague Court of Appeal found the Royal Netherlands Military Police guilty of racial profiling,” he stated.
Headscarf ban for police
The journalist famous that Dutch law enforcement officials on responsibility are usually not allowed to hold or put on non secular symbols.
“There has been a debate for several years now about police officers wearing religious symbols, and this debate mostly revolves around headscarves. National Coordinator for Combating Discrimination and Racism, Johan van Renswoude, has argued that officers should be able to wear headscarves or other religious symbols in the workplace,” he stated.
Verite said that when the Minister for Security and Justice Dilan Yesilgoz-Zegerius signed the brand new costume code on June 28, uniformed law enforcement officials had been banned from carrying clothes and niknaks equivalent to headscarves, crosses, or kippahs. The new costume code marked the top of the 6-month standing debate within the Netherlands on “freedom of the headscarf for the police.”
Source: www.dailysabah.com
